
New Hampshire Supreme Court
Cases Accepted - February 2001
* denotes appealing parties
00-193 State of NH v. Cook,* Lawrence
Attorney General David M. Rothstein
Stephen T. Jeffco
Aggravated felonious sexual assault, felonious sexual assault - denial
of motion to suppress statements; failure to dismiss on ground that
jury at first trial failed to follow court's instructions; denial of motion to
suppress evidence from one-party intercept; admission of
photographs; denial of jury instruction; allowing transcripts of one-
party intercept to go to jury room
00-592 In re Guardianship of Brittany S.
Christina M. Deslauriers, for Tammy G.*
John D. Cameron
Petition to terminate guardianship, motion for contempt - denial of
appointed counsel; whether refusal to appoint counsel in civil action is
immediately appealable under collateral order doctrine
00-746 State of NH v. Horner,* Phillip
Attorney General Mark L. Sisti
Felonious sexual assault - admission of documents to prove age of
victim that failed to comport with Evidence Rules 902, 1002-1005
00-747 State of NH v. Demers,* Arthur
Attorney General David M. Rothstein
Kimberly A. Shoen
Driving after certification as habitual offender, driving while
intoxicated, subsequent offense - statute of limitations; sufficiency of
evidence; admitting evidence of prior DWI conviction and status as
habitual offender despite stipulation to the same; allowing State to
argue that defense that someone else drove onto property was
invalid because defendant failed to raise the same prior to trial
00-749 State of NH v. Powers,* Rob
Attorney General David M. Rothstein
Nancy A. DeAngelis
Imposition of suspended sentence - sufficiency of evidence that
defendant knowingly exposed his genitals
00-754 Galvin,* Gerald v. Superintendent, House of
David Horan Corrections
Attorney General
Imposition of deferred sentence - whether all deferred sentences
contain implied condition of good behavior; whether court erred by
imposing deferred sentence for conduct not violating express condition
of deferment
00-756 State of NH v. Stratton,* Richard
Attorney General Rodkey Craighead, Jr.
Permitting gambling - failure to quash indictments; denial of jury
instructions on conscious avoidance and jury nullification; exclusion
of evidence of license fees charged by city for video poker machines;
denial of discovery of confidential informant; failure to suppress
identification; allowing detective to demonstratively testify as expert
that video poker machines were gambling machines
00-758 Constantly Pizza,* Appeal of
(compensation appeals board)
Eric G. Falkenham
Edward H. Moquin
Attorney General
Workers' compensation - whether decedent employee's blood alcohol
content of .07% at time of fatal car accident was evidence of
intoxication; whether board erred in rejecting expert testimony that
decedent's blood alcohol level substantially impaired his ability to
operate motor vehicle; whether employee's act of drinking alcohol
while making pizza deliveries constituted serious and willful
misconduct; failure to rule on requests for findings of fact
00-768 Finsen,* Mark v. Vermont Mutual Insurance
B. Michael Cormier Company
Gregory S. Clayton
Fire insurance - statute of limitations; whether insurer improperly
invoked notice provision in RSA 407:15; whether insurer required to
give plaintiff second notice under RSA 407:15 after plaintiff files a
voluntary non-suit; whether plaintiff may bring second suit after one-
year "saving" period in RSA 508:10 has expired when original three-
year statute of limitations has not expired
00-773 Rinker,* Earl A. III, Petition of
(NH Retirement System)
John E. Durkin
Attorney General
State retirement system - whether board of trustees has authority to
grant antecedent retirement benefits; failure to grant antecedent
benefits; whether board relied upon facts not in evidence
01-063 Sirrell, Evelyn, Kenneth v. State of NH and
Fox, Russell Wakefield Department of Revenue
Thomas Closson Administration*
Daniel Schwarz Attorney General
Arthur Greene
John F. Hayes
Uniform education property tax – whether current tax system meets
requirements for valuation at least every 5 years; whether tax for
1999 and 2000 tax years was reasonable and proportional; whether
proportional and reasonable tax can be achieved through tax
system, including local assessment and statewide equalization;
whether burden of proof improperly shifted to State; whether
repayment of $800 million is required; whether tax should remain in
effect while executive and legislative branches correct system