![]() |
|
|
Court Rules |
Attorney Discipline SystemOn January 1, 2004, a new Supreme Court Attorney Discipline System went into effect in New Hampshire. It has been designed to improve the effort to protect client rights and guarantee lawyers a full and fair evaluation of complaints against them. The system is composed of the Attorney Discipline Office, a Complaint Screening Committee, Hearings Committee and Professional Conduct Committee. Several significant changes have been made to improve the efficiency of the process. Additional staff has been hired for the Attorney Discipline Office, which will evaluate and process complaints against lawyers and prepare a report for a screening committee. Attorney Landya B. McCafferty has been named the new, full-time disciplinary counsel and will present cases when necessary to hearing committee panels. The hearings panels will then report their findings to the Professional Conduct Committee for disposition. McCafferty, who has worked for the N.H. Public Defender program and the appellate defender program at Franklin Pierce Law Center, has been a volunteer member of the Professional Conduct Committee for more than three years. Lawyers and members of the general public who would be interested in participating in this very important public service, when vacancies occur, are encouraged to complete an application for membership. As of June 1, 2007, the Supreme Court Attorney Discipline Office is located at 4 Chenell Drive, Suite 102, Concord, N.H. 03301. Phone: (603) 224-5828.
NEW
HAMPSHIRE SUPREME COURT Lawyers and members of the general public serve on the following committees of the New Hampshire Attorney Discipline System: Complaint Screening Committee The nine-member Complaint Screening Committee will consist of five lawyers and four non-lawyers. The Committee will meet once a month in Concord. All complaints alleging professional misconduct by lawyers, filed with the Attorney Discipline Office, will be fully investigated by the offices general counsel and his or her deputy and assistants. Counsel will then prepare reports on the results of their investigation and submit them to the members of the Complaint Screening Committee to read in advance of their meetings. Committee members will have little or no writing responsibilities. Counsel will make oral presentations at the committee meetings and members will take one of the following actions:
Hearings Committee The Hearings Committee currently consists of 34 members, both lawyers and members of the public, who will be appointed to hearings panels to consider individual cases. The number of times that members are asked to serve on a hearing panel in any given calendar year will depend on the number of cases in which hearings are required. It is expected that members may be asked to sit on four to six hearing panels a year. When the disciplinary counsel, acting on the recommendation of the screening committee, makes a request for a hearing, the Hearings Committee Chair will appoint a hearing panel from the Committees members.
Each hearing panel will consist of three to five members, with at
least one non-lawyer member on each panel. The Hearings Committee Chair
shall designate a hearing panel chair as well as a reporter who will be
responsible for writing the panel report.
The ability to write is an important qualification for this committee. Professional Conduct Committee The 12-member Professional Conduct Committee will consist of eight lawyers and four non-lawyers. The Committee will meet in Concord on the third Tuesday of the month. Meetings may last about one half a day. The ability to write decisions is an important qualification for membership on the Professional Conduct Committee. The Committee, acting as a whole, will consider hearing panel reports and memoranda submitted by respondent-attorneys and disciplinary counsel. When requested, the Committee will hold oral arguments. The Committee will consider the record and take one of the following actions: · Dismiss complaints, with or without a warning, administer a reprimand, public censure or a suspension not to exceed six months. · Attach appropriate conditions to any discipline it imposes. · Offer diversion to respondent-attorneys if appropriate. · Direct disciplinary counsel to file a petition in the New Hampshire Supreme Court on all matters in which the Committee decides that the appropriate sanction should be disbarment or suspension of more than six months. · Where appropriate, assess to a disciplined respondent-attorney expenses incurred by the Attorney Discipline System in the investigation and enforcement of discipline. Complete text of August 27, 2003 Supreme Court order on Rule 37, Attorney Discipline System. See Rules of Professional Conduct in the NH Court Rules. |
|
|
Judicial Branch Homepage | Administrative Office of the Courts | Supreme Court
Superior Court | District Court | Probate Court
Family Division | Alternative Dispute Resolution Program